 |
|
06-07-2008, 10:09 AM
|
#46
|
|
Moderator/Event-Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Stance
Posts: 12,613
Car: S54
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by someguy
last year around the same time i did a comparison on gas mileage, and as with this time, I tried to make sure my variables were constant...except for the station I filled up at. The results:
sunoco 94 (well duh) > shell 91 > esso 91 > sunoco 91 > petro canada 91 > olco "supreme"
of course these are not scientifically accurate or anything, but I made the effort, mainly because I was curious, but also because I was bored.
|
That actually doesn't make much sense, unless the motor was so highly tuned that it detonates on anything less than 94 (which would have to be a seriously aggressive map/compression ratio). The Sunoco 94 is 10% ethanol (as well as the 91 in most other stations) while the Shell 91 has none. This tells you right away that the Shell 91 will be more efficient.
And for the record, I did the same test in back to back tanks in my M3. The Shell 91 consistently averaged around 50km more per tank than Sunoco 94.
__________________
|
|
|
06-07-2008, 04:38 PM
|
#47
|
|
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 389
Car: 1998 M3
|
I fill my car with 91. I usually get 450km to a tank. The other week I went up north and I averaged 570km, although I wasn't driving very economically. I have a 98 M3.
__________________
2003 BMW 330CiC CURRENT
1996 Toyota Camry FOR SALE
1998 BMW M3 IN EUROPE
2004 Mitsubishi Galant SOLD
1993 Plymouth Duster SOLD
|
|
|
06-07-2008, 04:39 PM
|
#48
|
|
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 389
Car: 1998 M3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystikal
And for the record, I did the same test in back to back tanks in my M3. The Shell 91 consistently averaged around 50km more per tank than Sunoco 94.
|
I'm switching to Shell.
__________________
2003 BMW 330CiC CURRENT
1996 Toyota Camry FOR SALE
1998 BMW M3 IN EUROPE
2004 Mitsubishi Galant SOLD
1993 Plymouth Duster SOLD
|
|
|
06-07-2008, 04:40 PM
|
#49
|
|
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 389
Car: 1998 M3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JunzieB
I concur... So far i've gotten nothing but shitty mileage from petro.
The only place i fill up is Shell or Sunoco
I still can't beleiev the numbers that i'm hearing... Mystikal - 800km to a tank???? Damn i'm jealous.
So far, My air filter is new, my fuel filter is new, maybe it's time to change my spark plugs?
What else am i missing?  Maybe it's time i got some injector cleaner, that'l give me that extra 150km that i'm missing 
|
Maybe a 1.8 swap??
__________________
2003 BMW 330CiC CURRENT
1996 Toyota Camry FOR SALE
1998 BMW M3 IN EUROPE
2004 Mitsubishi Galant SOLD
1993 Plymouth Duster SOLD
|
|
|
06-07-2008, 05:09 PM
|
#50
|
|
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 507
Car: 1993 325is
|
7.35 l/100km at 65mph
around 9 when driven nromal
325 is m50
|
|
|
06-07-2008, 05:43 PM
|
#51
|
|
Singhy
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 771
Car: '98 323is
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystikal
That actually doesn't make much sense, unless the motor was so highly tuned that it detonates on anything less than 94 (which would have to be a seriously aggressive map/compression ratio). The Sunoco 94 is 10% ethanol (as well as the 91 in most other stations) while the Shell 91 has none. This tells you right away that the Shell 91 will be more efficient.
And for the record, I did the same test in back to back tanks in my M3. The Shell 91 consistently averaged around 50km more per tank than Sunoco 94.
|
yea i realize that but I still ended up getting about 25 more kilometers out of the sunoco 94....i run shell 91 whenever I can. It has proven to be the most cost effective fuel for my car.
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 12:10 PM
|
#52
|
|
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Landing
Posts: 1,326
Car: A4,74 TR6, 07 KX250F
|
So I filled up today.. ran her bone dry. thought I might even be a road side watcher...
anyways.. i got 615kms per a tank of esso 91.. not bad.. I filled up with Shell 91 today see if I can beat that..
by the way my car took 58L of gas... yep BONE DRY!!
__________________
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 12:35 PM
|
#53
|
|
JUICY J CAN'T
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: T.
Posts: 16,978
Car: S54 titties
|
if you put 58L in, then you had 7L left. e36 tanks are 60L tanks + 5L reserve.
615/58 = 10.6KM/L
You could've driven another 70KM
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#54
|
|
Wants more powaaa!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: B-Town
Posts: 1,460
Car: 97, 328i
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by propr'one
if you put 58L in, then you had 7L left. e36 tanks are 60L tanks + 5L reserve.
615/58 = 10.6KM/L
You could've driven another 70KM
|
I thought it was a 8L reserve  At least i thought that's what i read from the owner's manual yesterday.
Either way, I'm too damn scared to drive my car after the light comes up
__________________
Quote:
Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by JunzieB is his alone and does not reflect the opinions of Maxbimmer or any members thereof. JunzieB is not responsible for any hurt feelings that may develop during the reading of his posts.
|
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 03:54 PM
|
#55
|
|
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 1,581
Car: 95 325i (loaded to the teets)
|
enough with the bone dry comments people, dont encourage it. you let it go on empty then your fuel pump will fail and thats 200$ right there to replace it. all your fuel economy goes out the window. i know this from experience.
__________________
Proud owner of a 95 325i
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#56
|
|
Sex Wagon
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,471
Car: E36 / E91
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sproule905
So I filled up today.. ran her bone dry. thought I might even be a road side watcher...
anyways.. i got 615kms per a tank of esso 91.. not bad.. I filled up with Shell 91 today see if I can beat that..
by the way my car took 58L of gas... yep BONE DRY!!
|
So you drove 615 km before 12 pm?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpine86
Do we really need an Ipad???
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigD
Only if you have an iVag.
|
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 08:33 AM
|
#57
|
|
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Landing
Posts: 1,326
Car: A4,74 TR6, 07 KX250F
|
^^^
not in one shot.. over a week and a half...
Propr'one... 5L reserve.. from what point does this reserve kick in? when the light goes on? or when the needle is burried... not that I want to take a chance and be stranded.
__________________
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 01:03 PM
|
#58
|
|
ΛΦΕ
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Etobicoke / Waterloo
Posts: 1,483
Car: 330ci , 328is
|
ive calculated mine.. 35 L and i do 280 km...
i have a 328i auto and i dont push it at all lol.
it came out to 12.9 L / 100km
isnt that badd? lol wats wrong wit myyy carrr
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 01:19 PM
|
#59
|
|
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Landing
Posts: 1,326
Car: A4,74 TR6, 07 KX250F
|
^^ you're actually doing 8L / 100kms
280/35L= 8L/100km
__________________
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 01:21 PM
|
#60
|
|
ΛΦΕ
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Etobicoke / Waterloo
Posts: 1,483
Car: 330ci , 328is
|
lol oh shit haha thats pretty decent 
cuz i used the calculator thing on the internet. lol i guess i did it wrong
thxx for calculating tho
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.
|